版本：11
SELECT, TABLE, WITH — 從資料表或檢視表中檢索資料列
SELECT 從零個或多個資料表中檢索資料列。SELECT 的一般處理如下：
計算 WITH 列表中的所有查詢語句。這有效地製作可以在 FROM 列表中引用的臨時資料表。在 FROM 中多次引用的 WITH 查詢僅會計算一次。（參閱下面的 WITH 子句。）
FROM 列表中的所有元素都是計算出來的。（FROM 列表中的每個元素可以是一個真實或虛擬的資料表。）如果在 FROM 列表中指定了多個元素，它們將會交叉查詢在一起。 （參閱下面的 FROM 語句。）
如果指定了 WHERE 子句，則從會輸出中過濾掉所有不滿足條件的資料列。（參閱下面的 WHERE 子句。）
如果使用了 GROUP BY 子句，或者存在彙總函數的呼叫，則將輸出組合成與一個或多個相符合的資料列群組，合併計算彙總函數的結果。如果存在 HAVING 子句，則會刪除不滿足給定條件的群組。（參閱下面的 GROUP BY 子句和 HAVING 子句。）
使用每個選定的資料列或資料列群組的 SELECT 輸出表示式計算實際輸出的資料列。 （參閱下面的 SELECT List。）
SELECT DISTINCT 從結果中刪除重複的資料列。SELECT DISTINCT ON 消除了在所有指定表示式上符合的資料列。SELECT ALL（預設值）將回傳所有的候選資料列，包括重複的資料列。 （參閱下面的 DISTINCT 子句。）
使用運算子 UNION、INTERSECT 和 EXCEPT，可以組合多個 SELECT 語句的輸出以形成單個結果集合。UNION 運算子回傳一個或兩個結果集合中的所有資料列。 INTERSECT 運算子回傳同時在兩個結果集合中的所有資料列。EXCEPT 運算子回傳第一個結果集合中但不在第二個結果集合中的資料列。在所有三種情況下，除非指定了 ALL，否則將刪除重複的資料列。可以添加 DISTINCT 以明確指定消除重複資料列。請注意，DISTINCT 是此處的預設行為，即使 ALL 是 SELECT 本身的預設行為。 （參閱下面的 UNION 子句、INTERSECT 子句和 EXCEPT 子句。）
如果使用了 ORDER BY 子句，則回傳的資料列按指定的順序排序。如果未使用 ORDER BY，則以系統最快産生的順序回傳資料列。（參閱下面的 ORDER BY 子句。）
如果使用了 LIMIT（或 FETCH FIRST）或 OFFSET 子句，則 SELECT 語句僅回傳結果資料列的子集。（參閱下面的 LIMIT 子句。）
如果使用了 FOR UPDATE、FOR NO KEY UPDATE、FOR SHARE 或 FOR KEY SHARE，則 SELECT 語句將鎖定所選的資料列以防止同時更新。（參閱下面的 Locking 子句。）
您必須對 SELECT 指令中使用的每個欄位具有 SELECT 權限。FOR NO KEY UPDATE、FOR UPDATE、FOR SHARE 或 FOR KEY SHARE 的使用也需要 UPDATE 權限（對於如此選擇的每個資料表的至少一個欄位）。
WITH 子句WITH 子句可以讓您指定一個或多個子查詢，這些子查詢可以在主查詢中以名稱引用。子查詢在主查詢的存續時間內有效地充當臨時資料表或檢視表。每個子查詢可以是 SELECT、TABLE、VALUES、INSERT、UPDATE 或 DELETE 語句。在 WITH 中使用資料變更語句（INSERT、UPDATE 或 DELETE）時，通常會包含 RETURNING 子句。它作為 RETURNING 的輸出，而不是語句修改的基礎資料表，它會構成主查詢所讀取的臨時資料表。 如果省略 RETURNING，則仍會執行該語句，但不會產生任何輸出，因此主查詢就不能將其作為資料表所引用。
必須為每個 WITH 查詢指定名稱（不用限定綱要）。選擇性地，可以指定欄位名稱列表；如果省略的話，則從子查詢中推斷欄位名稱。
如果指定了 RECURSIVE，也允許 SELECT 子查詢以名稱引用本身。這樣的子查詢必須具有這樣的形式
遞迴自我引用必須出現在 UNION 的右側。每個查詢只允許一次遞迴自我引用。不支援遞迴式的資料變更語句，但您可以在資料變更語句中使用遞迴 SELECT 查詢的結果。相關範例，請參閱第 7.8 節。
RECURSIVE 的另一個作用是不需要對 WITH 查詢進行排序：查詢可以引用列表後面的另一個查詢。（但是，未實作循環引用或相互遞迴。）如果沒有 RECURSIVE，WITH 查詢只能引用相鄰的 WITH，精確來說是 WITH 列表中較早的查詢。
WITH 查詢的一個關鍵屬性是，每次執行主查詢時，它們只會被運算一次，即使主查詢多次引用它們也是如此。特別的是，無論主查詢是讀取所有輸出還是任何輸出，都保證資料變更語句只會執行一次。
主查詢和 WITH 查詢都是（概念上）同時執行的。 這意味著除了透過讀取其 RETURNING 輸出之外，不能從查詢的其他部分看到 WITH 中的資料變更語句的執行結果。如果兩個此類資料變更語句嘗試修改同一筆資料，則無法預想其結果為何。
有關其他資訊，請參閱第 7.8 節。
FROM ClauseFROM子句為SELECT指定一個或多個來源資料表。如果指定了多個來源，則結果是所有來源的 Cartesian product（cross join）。但通常會加上過濾條件（透過 WHERE），將回傳的資料列限制在其中一小部分。
FROM 子句可以包含以下內容：
table_name
現有資料表或檢視表的名稱（可加上綱要名稱）。如果在資料表名稱之前指定了 ONLY，則僅掃描該資料表。如果未指定 ONLY，則掃描資料表及其所有繼承資料表（如果有的）。 （選擇性）可以在資料表名稱後指定 * 以明確指示包含繼承資料表。
alias
提供 FROM 子句中的項目別名。別名用於簡潔或消除自我交叉查詢的模糊性（多次掃描同一個資料表）。提供別名時，它會完全隱藏資料表或函數的實際名稱；例如，給定 FROM foo AS f，SELECT 的其餘部分就必須將此項目稱為 f 而不是 foo。使用別名時，還可以編寫欄位別名列表以提供資料表的一個或多個欄位的替換名稱。
TABLESAMPLE sampling_method ( argument [, ...] ) [ REPEATABLE ( seed ) ]
table_name 之後的 TABLESAMPLE 子句表示應使用指定的 sampling_method 來檢索該資料表中的子集合。此抽樣將優先於任何其他過濾程序（如 WHERE 子句）。標準的 PostgreSQL 發行版包含兩種抽樣方法，BERNOULLI 和 SYSTEM，其他抽樣方法可以通過延伸功能安裝在資料庫中。
BERNOULLI 和 SYSTEM 抽樣方法都接受一個參數，該參數是要抽樣資料表的一部分，為 0 到 100 之間的百分比。此參數可以是任何實數表示式。（其他採樣方法可以接受更多或不同的參數。）這兩種方法都回傳一個隨機選擇的資料表樣本，該資料表將包含表行的大約指定的百分比。BERNOULLI 方法會掃描整個資料表，並以指定的機率獨立選擇或忽略各個資料列。SYSTEM 方法對具有指定機會被選中的每個磁碟區塊進行區塊級抽樣；回傳每個選定區塊中的所有資料列。當指定小的抽樣百分比時，SYSTEM 方法明顯快於 BERNOULLI 方法，但由於聚類效應，它可能回傳資料表中較不隨機的樣本。
選擇性的參數 REPEATABLE 子句指定用於在抽樣方法中産生隨機數的種子編號或表示式。種子值可以是任何非 null 浮點值。如果資料表沒有更新，則指定相同種子和參數值的兩個查詢將選擇資料表相同樣本。但是不同的種子值通常會產生不同的樣本。如果未設定 REPEATABLE，則由系統産生種子為每個查詢選擇新的隨機樣本。請注意，某些附加的抽樣方法不接受 REPEATABLE，每次使用時都會産生新的樣本。
select
sub-SELECT 可以出現在 FROM 子句中。就像在一般 SELECT 指令在執行時間時將其輸出建立為臨時資料表一樣。請注意，sub-SELECT 必須使用括號括起來，並且必須為它提供別名。這裡也可以使用 VALUES 指令。
with_query_name
透過使用其名稱來引用 WITH 查詢，就像查詢名稱是資料表名稱一樣。（事實上，為了主查詢的需要，WITH 查詢會隱藏任何同名的資料表。如果需要的話，也可以加上綱要限定的資料表名稱來引用同名的真實資料表。）別名可以使用，方式與資料表相同。
function_name
Function calls can appear in the FROM clause. (This is especially useful for functions that return result sets, but any function can be used.) This acts as though the function's output were created as a temporary table for the duration of this single SELECT command. When the optional WITH ORDINALITY clause is added to the function call, a new column is appended after all the function's output columns with numbering for each row.
An alias can be provided in the same way as for a table. If an alias is written, a column alias list can also be written to provide substitute names for one or more attributes of the function's composite return type, including the column added by ORDINALITY if present.
Multiple function calls can be combined into a single FROM-clause item by surrounding them with ROWS FROM( ... ). The output of such an item is the concatenation of the first row from each function, then the second row from each function, etc. If some of the functions produce fewer rows than others, null values are substituted for the missing data, so that the total number of rows returned is always the same as for the function that produced the most rows.
If the function has been defined as returning the record data type, then an alias or the key word AS must be present, followed by a column definition list in the form ( column_name data_type [, ... ]). The column definition list must match the actual number and types of columns returned by the function.
When using the ROWS FROM( ... ) syntax, if one of the functions requires a column definition list, it's preferred to put the column definition list after the function call inside ROWS FROM( ... ). A column definition list can be placed after the ROWS FROM( ... ) construct only if there's just a single function and no WITH ORDINALITY clause.
To use ORDINALITY together with a column definition list, you must use the ROWS FROM( ... ) syntax and put the column definition list inside ROWS FROM( ... ).
join_type
One of
[ INNER ] JOIN
LEFT [ OUTER ] JOIN
RIGHT [ OUTER ] JOIN
FULL [ OUTER ] JOIN
CROSS JOIN
For the INNER and OUTER join types, a join condition must be specified, namely exactly one of NATURAL, ON join_condition, or USING (join_column [, ...]). See below for the meaning. For CROSS JOIN, none of these clauses can appear.
A JOIN clause combines two FROM items, which for convenience we will refer to as “tables”, though in reality they can be any type of FROM item. Use parentheses if necessary to determine the order of nesting. In the absence of parentheses, JOINs nest left-to-right. In any case JOIN binds more tightly than the commas separating FROM-list items.
CROSS JOIN and INNER JOIN produce a simple Cartesian product, the same result as you get from listing the two tables at the top level of FROM, but restricted by the join condition (if any). CROSS JOIN is equivalent to INNER JOIN ON (TRUE), that is, no rows are removed by qualification. These join types are just a notational convenience, since they do nothing you couldn't do with plain FROM and WHERE.
LEFT OUTER JOIN returns all rows in the qualified Cartesian product (i.e., all combined rows that pass its join condition), plus one copy of each row in the left-hand table for which there was no right-hand row that passed the join condition. This left-hand row is extended to the full width of the joined table by inserting null values for the right-hand columns. Note that only the JOIN clause's own condition is considered while deciding which rows have matches. Outer conditions are applied afterwards.
Conversely, RIGHT OUTER JOIN returns all the joined rows, plus one row for each unmatched right-hand row (extended with nulls on the left). This is just a notational convenience, since you could convert it to a LEFT OUTER JOIN by switching the left and right tables.
FULL OUTER JOIN returns all the joined rows, plus one row for each unmatched left-hand row (extended with nulls on the right), plus one row for each unmatched right-hand row (extended with nulls on the left).ON join_condition
join_condition is an expression resulting in a value of type boolean (similar to a WHERE clause) that specifies which rows in a join are considered to match.USING ( join_column [, ...] )
A clause of the form USING ( a, b, ... ) is shorthand for ON left_table.a = right_table.a AND left_table.b = right_table.b .... Also, USING implies that only one of each pair of equivalent columns will be included in the join output, not both.
NATURAL
NATURAL 是 USING 列表的簡寫，它表示兩個資料表中具有匹配名稱的所有欄位。如果沒有共同的欄位名稱，則 NATURAL 等於 ON TRUE。
LATERAL
The LATERAL key word can precede a sub-SELECT FROM item. This allows the sub-SELECT to refer to columns of FROM items that appear before it in the FROM list. (Without LATERAL, each sub-SELECT is evaluated independently and so cannot cross-reference any other FROMitem.)
LATERAL can also precede a function-call FROM item, but in this case it is a noise word, because the function expression can refer to earlier FROM items in any case.
A LATERAL item can appear at top level in the FROM list, or within a JOIN tree. In the latter case it can also refer to any items that are on the left-hand side of a JOIN that it is on the right-hand side of.
When a FROM item contains LATERAL cross-references, evaluation proceeds as follows: for each row of the FROM item providing the cross-referenced column(s), or set of rows of multiple FROM items providing the columns, the LATERAL item is evaluated using that row or row set's values of the columns. The resulting row(s) are joined as usual with the rows they were computed from. This is repeated for each row or set of rows from the column source table(s).
The column source table(s) must be INNER or LEFT joined to the LATERAL item, else there would not be a well-defined set of rows from which to compute each set of rows for the LATERAL item. Thus, although a construct such as X RIGHT JOIN LATERAL Y is syntactically valid, it is not actually allowed for Y to reference X.
WHERE ClauseThe optional WHERE clause has the general form
where condition is any expression that evaluates to a result of type boolean. Any row that does not satisfy this condition will be eliminated from the output. A row satisfies the condition if it returns true when the actual row values are substituted for any variable references.
GROUP BY ClauseThe optional GROUP BY clause has the general form
GROUP BY will condense into a single row all selected rows that share the same values for the grouped expressions. An expression used inside a grouping_element can be an input column name, or the name or ordinal number of an output column (SELECT list item), or an arbitrary expression formed from input-column values. In case of ambiguity, a GROUP BY name will be interpreted as an input-column name rather than an output column name.
If any of GROUPING SETS, ROLLUP or CUBE are present as grouping elements, then the GROUP BY clause as a whole defines some number of independent grouping sets. The effect of this is equivalent to constructing a UNION ALL between subqueries with the individual grouping sets as their GROUP BY clauses. For further details on the handling of grouping sets see Section 7.2.4.
Aggregate functions, if any are used, are computed across all rows making up each group, producing a separate value for each group. (If there are aggregate functions but no GROUP BY clause, the query is treated as having a single group comprising all the selected rows.) The set of rows fed to each aggregate function can be further filtered by attaching a FILTER clause to the aggregate function call; see Section 4.2.7 for more information. When a FILTER clause is present, only those rows matching it are included in the input to that aggregate function.
When GROUP BY is present, or any aggregate functions are present, it is not valid for the SELECT list expressions to refer to ungrouped columns except within aggregate functions or when the ungrouped column is functionally dependent on the grouped columns, since there would otherwise be more than one possible value to return for an ungrouped column. A functional dependency exists if the grouped columns (or a subset thereof) are the primary key of the table containing the ungrouped column.
Keep in mind that all aggregate functions are evaluated before evaluating any “scalar” expressions in the HAVING clause or SELECT list. This means that, for example, a CASE expression cannot be used to skip evaluation of an aggregate function; see Section 4.2.14.
Currently, FOR NO KEY UPDATE, FOR UPDATE, FOR SHARE and FOR KEY SHARE cannot be specified with GROUP BY.
HAVING ClauseThe optional HAVING clause has the general form
where condition is the same as specified for the WHERE clause.
HAVING eliminates group rows that do not satisfy the condition. HAVING is different from WHERE: WHERE filters individual rows before the application of GROUP BY, while HAVING filters group rows created by GROUP BY. Each column referenced in condition must unambiguously reference a grouping column, unless the reference appears within an aggregate function or the ungrouped column is functionally dependent on the grouping columns.
The presence of HAVING turns a query into a grouped query even if there is no GROUP BY clause. This is the same as what happens when the query contains aggregate functions but no GROUP BY clause. All the selected rows are considered to form a single group, and the SELECTlist and HAVING clause can only reference table columns from within aggregate functions. Such a query will emit a single row if the HAVING condition is true, zero rows if it is not true.
Currently, FOR NO KEY UPDATE, FOR UPDATE, FOR SHARE and FOR KEY SHARE cannot be specified with HAVING.
WINDOW ClauseThe optional WINDOW clause has the general form
where window_name is a name that can be referenced from OVER clauses or subsequent window definitions, and window_definition is
If an existing_window_name is specified it must refer to an earlier entry in the WINDOW list; the new window copies its partitioning clause from that entry, as well as its ordering clause if any. In this case the new window cannot specify its own PARTITION BY clause, and it can specify ORDER BY only if the copied window does not have one. The new window always uses its own frame clause; the copied window must not specify a frame clause.
The elements of the PARTITION BY list are interpreted in much the same fashion as elements of a GROUP BY Clause, except that they are always simple expressions and never the name or number of an output column. Another difference is that these expressions can contain aggregate function calls, which are not allowed in a regular GROUP BY clause. They are allowed here because windowing occurs after grouping and aggregation.
Similarly, the elements of the ORDER BY list are interpreted in much the same fashion as elements of an ORDER BY Clause, except that the expressions are always taken as simple expressions and never the name or number of an output column.
The optional frame_clause defines the window frame for window functions that depend on the frame (not all do). The window frame is a set of related rows for each row of the query (called the current row). The frame_clause can be one of
where frame_start and frame_end can be one of
If frame_end is omitted it defaults to CURRENT ROW. Restrictions are that frame_start cannot be UNBOUNDED FOLLOWING, frame_end cannot be UNBOUNDED PRECEDING, and the frame_end choice cannot appear earlier in the above list than the frame_start choice — for example RANGE BETWEEN CURRENT ROW AND value PRECEDING is not allowed.
The default framing option is RANGE UNBOUNDED PRECEDING, which is the same as RANGE BETWEEN UNBOUNDED PRECEDING AND CURRENT ROW; it sets the frame to be all rows from the partition start up through the current row's last peer (a row that ORDER BY considers equivalent to the current row, or all rows if there is no ORDER BY). In general, UNBOUNDED PRECEDING means that the frame starts with the first row of the partition, and similarly UNBOUNDED FOLLOWING means that the frame ends with the last row of the partition (regardless of RANGE or ROWS mode). In ROWS mode, CURRENT ROW means that the frame starts or ends with the current row; but in RANGE mode it means that the frame starts or ends with the current row's first or last peer in the ORDER BY ordering. The value PRECEDING and value FOLLOWING cases are currently only allowed in ROWS mode. They indicate that the frame starts or ends with the row that many rows before or after the current row. value must be an integer expression not containing any variables, aggregate functions, or window functions. The value must not be null or negative; but it can be zero, which selects the current row itself.
Beware that the ROWS options can produce unpredictable results if the ORDER BY ordering does not order the rows uniquely. The RANGE options are designed to ensure that rows that are peers in the ORDER BY ordering are treated alike; all peer rows will be in the same frame.
The purpose of a WINDOW clause is to specify the behavior of window functions appearing in the query's SELECT List or ORDER BY Clause. These functions can reference the WINDOW clause entries by name in their OVER clauses. A WINDOW clause entry does not have to be referenced anywhere, however; if it is not used in the query it is simply ignored. It is possible to use window functions without any WINDOW clause at all, since a window function call can specify its window definition directly in its OVER clause. However, the WINDOW clause saves typing when the same window definition is needed for more than one window function.
Currently, FOR NO KEY UPDATE, FOR UPDATE, FOR SHARE and FOR KEY SHARE cannot be specified with WINDOW.
Window functions are described in detail in Section 3.5, Section 4.2.8, and Section 7.2.5.
SELECT ListThe SELECT list (between the key words SELECT and FROM) specifies expressions that form the output rows of the SELECT statement. The expressions can (and usually do) refer to columns computed in the FROM clause.
Just as in a table, every output column of a SELECT has a name. In a simple SELECT this name is just used to label the column for display, but when the SELECT is a sub-query of a larger query, the name is seen by the larger query as the column name of the virtual table produced by the sub-query. To specify the name to use for an output column, write AS output_name after the column's expression. (You can omit AS, but only if the desired output name does not match any PostgreSQL keyword (see Appendix C). For protection against possible future keyword additions, it is recommended that you always either write AS or double-quote the output name.) If you do not specify a column name, a name is chosen automatically by PostgreSQL. If the column's expression is a simple column reference then the chosen name is the same as that column's name. In more complex cases a function or type name may be used, or the system may fall back on a generated name such as ?column?.
An output column's name can be used to refer to the column's value in ORDER BY and GROUP BY clauses, but not in the WHERE or HAVING clauses; there you must write out the expression instead.
Instead of an expression, * can be written in the output list as a shorthand for all the columns of the selected rows. Also, you can write table_name.* as a shorthand for the columns coming from just that table. In these cases it is not possible to specify new names with AS; the output column names will be the same as the table columns' names.
According to the SQL standard, the expressions in the output list should be computed before applying DISTINCT, ORDER BY, or LIMIT. This is obviously necessary when using DISTINCT, since otherwise it's not clear what values are being made distinct. However, in many cases it is convenient if output expressions are computed after ORDER BY and LIMIT; particularly if the output list contains any volatile or expensive functions. With that behavior, the order of function evaluations is more intuitive and there will not be evaluations corresponding to rows that never appear in the output. PostgreSQL will effectively evaluate output expressions after sorting and limiting, so long as those expressions are not referenced in DISTINCT, ORDER BY or GROUP BY. (As a counterexample, SELECT f(x) FROM tab ORDER BY 1 clearly must evaluate f(x) before sorting.) Output expressions that contain set-returning functions are effectively evaluated after sorting and before limiting, so that LIMIT will act to cut off the output from a set-returning function.
PostgreSQL versions before 9.6 did not provide any guarantees about the timing of evaluation of output expressions versus sorting and limiting; it depended on the form of the chosen query plan.
DISTINCT ClauseIf SELECT DISTINCT is specified, all duplicate rows are removed from the result set (one row is kept from each group of duplicates). SELECT ALL specifies the opposite: all rows are kept; that is the default.
SELECT DISTINCT ON ( expression [, ...] ) keeps only the first row of each set of rows where the given expressions evaluate to equal. The DISTINCT ON expressions are interpreted using the same rules as for ORDER BY (see above). Note that the “first row” of each set is unpredictable unless ORDER BY is used to ensure that the desired row appears first. For example:
retrieves the most recent weather report for each location. But if we had not used ORDER BY to force descending order of time values for each location, we'd have gotten a report from an unpredictable time for each location.
The DISTINCT ON expression(s) must match the leftmost ORDER BY expression(s). The ORDER BY clause will normally contain additional expression(s) that determine the desired precedence of rows within each DISTINCT ON group.
Currently, FOR NO KEY UPDATE, FOR UPDATE, FOR SHARE and FOR KEY SHARE cannot be specified with DISTINCT.
UNION ClauseThe UNION clause has this general form:
select_statement is any SELECT statement without an ORDER BY, LIMIT, FOR NO KEY UPDATE, FOR UPDATE, FOR SHARE, or FOR KEY SHARE clause. (ORDER BY and LIMIT can be attached to a subexpression if it is enclosed in parentheses. Without parentheses, these clauses will be taken to apply to the result of the UNION, not to its right-hand input expression.)
The UNION operator computes the set union of the rows returned by the involved SELECT statements. A row is in the set union of two result sets if it appears in at least one of the result sets. The two SELECT statements that represent the direct operands of the UNION must produce the same number of columns, and corresponding columns must be of compatible data types.
The result of UNION does not contain any duplicate rows unless the ALL option is specified. ALL prevents elimination of duplicates. (Therefore, UNION ALL is usually significantly quicker than UNION; use ALL when you can.) DISTINCT can be written to explicitly specify the default behavior of eliminating duplicate rows.
Multiple UNION operators in the same SELECT statement are evaluated left to right, unless otherwise indicated by parentheses.
Currently, FOR NO KEY UPDATE, FOR UPDATE, FOR SHARE and FOR KEY SHARE cannot be specified either for a UNION result or for any input of a UNION.
INTERSECT ClauseThe INTERSECT clause has this general form:
select_statement is any SELECT statement without an ORDER BY, LIMIT, FOR NO KEY UPDATE, FOR UPDATE, FOR SHARE, or FOR KEY SHARE clause.
The INTERSECT operator computes the set intersection of the rows returned by the involved SELECT statements. A row is in the intersection of two result sets if it appears in both result sets.
The result of INTERSECT does not contain any duplicate rows unless the ALL option is specified. With ALL, a row that has m duplicates in the left table and n duplicates in the right table will appear min(m,n) times in the result set. DISTINCT can be written to explicitly specify the default behavior of eliminating duplicate rows.
Multiple INTERSECT operators in the same SELECT statement are evaluated left to right, unless parentheses dictate otherwise. INTERSECT binds more tightly than UNION. That is, A UNION B INTERSECT C will be read as A UNION (B INTERSECT C).
Currently, FOR NO KEY UPDATE, FOR UPDATE, FOR SHARE and FOR KEY SHARE cannot be specified either for an INTERSECT result or for any input of an INTERSECT.
EXCEPT ClauseThe EXCEPT clause has this general form:
select_statement is any SELECT statement without an ORDER BY, LIMIT, FOR NO KEY UPDATE, FOR UPDATE, FOR SHARE, or FOR KEY SHARE clause.
The EXCEPT operator computes the set of rows that are in the result of the left SELECT statement but not in the result of the right one.
The result of EXCEPT does not contain any duplicate rows unless the ALL option is specified. With ALL, a row that has m duplicates in the left table and n duplicates in the right table will appear max(m-n,0) times in the result set. DISTINCT can be written to explicitly specify the default behavior of eliminating duplicate rows.
Multiple EXCEPT operators in the same SELECT statement are evaluated left to right, unless parentheses dictate otherwise. EXCEPT binds at the same level as UNION.
Currently, FOR NO KEY UPDATE, FOR UPDATE, FOR SHARE and FOR KEY SHARE cannot be specified either for an EXCEPT result or for any input of an EXCEPT.
ORDER BY ClauseThe optional ORDER BY clause has this general form:
The ORDER BY clause causes the result rows to be sorted according to the specified expression(s). If two rows are equal according to the leftmost expression, they are compared according to the next expression and so on. If they are equal according to all specified expressions, they are returned in an implementation-dependent order.
Each expression can be the name or ordinal number of an output column (SELECT list item), or it can be an arbitrary expression formed from input-column values.
The ordinal number refers to the ordinal (left-to-right) position of the output column. This feature makes it possible to define an ordering on the basis of a column that does not have a unique name. This is never absolutely necessary because it is always possible to assign a name to an output column using the AS clause.
It is also possible to use arbitrary expressions in the ORDER BY clause, including columns that do not appear in the SELECT output list. Thus the following statement is valid:
A limitation of this feature is that an ORDER BY clause applying to the result of a UNION, INTERSECT, or EXCEPT clause can only specify an output column name or number, not an expression.
If an ORDER BY expression is a simple name that matches both an output column name and an input column name, ORDER BY will interpret it as the output column name. This is the opposite of the choice that GROUP BY will make in the same situation. This inconsistency is made to be compatible with the SQL standard.
Optionally one can add the key word ASC (ascending) or DESC (descending) after any expression in the ORDER BY clause. If not specified, ASC is assumed by default. Alternatively, a specific ordering operator name can be specified in the USING clause. An ordering operator must be a less-than or greater-than member of some B-tree operator family. ASC is usually equivalent to USING < and DESC is usually equivalent to USING >. (But the creator of a user-defined data type can define exactly what the default sort ordering is, and it might correspond to operators with other names.)
If NULLS LAST is specified, null values sort after all non-null values; if NULLS FIRST is specified, null values sort before all non-null values. If neither is specified, the default behavior is NULLS LAST when ASC is specified or implied, and NULLS FIRST when DESC is specified (thus, the default is to act as though nulls are larger than non-nulls). When USING is specified, the default nulls ordering depends on whether the operator is a less-than or greater-than operator.
Note that ordering options apply only to the expression they follow; for example ORDER BY x, y DESC does not mean the same thing as ORDER BY x DESC, y DESC.
Character-string data is sorted according to the collation that applies to the column being sorted. That can be overridden at need by including a COLLATE clause in the expression, for example ORDER BY mycolumn COLLATE "en_US". For more information see Section 4.2.10 andSection 23.2.
LIMIT ClauseThe LIMIT clause consists of two independent sub-clauses:
count specifies the maximum number of rows to return, while start specifies the number of rows to skip before starting to return rows. When both are specified, start rows are skipped before starting to count the count rows to be returned.
If the count expression evaluates to NULL, it is treated as LIMIT ALL, i.e., no limit. If start evaluates to NULL, it is treated the same as OFFSET 0.
SQL:2008 introduced a different syntax to achieve the same result, which PostgreSQL also supports. It is:
In this syntax, to write anything except a simple integer constant for start or count, you must write parentheses around it. If count is omitted in a FETCH clause, it defaults to 1. ROW and ROWS as well as FIRST and NEXT are noise words that don't influence the effects of these clauses. According to the standard, the OFFSET clause must come before the FETCH clause if both are present; but PostgreSQL is laxer and allows either order.
When using LIMIT, it is a good idea to use an ORDER BY clause that constrains the result rows into a unique order. Otherwise you will get an unpredictable subset of the query's rows — you might be asking for the tenth through twentieth rows, but tenth through twentieth in what ordering? You don't know what ordering unless you specify ORDER BY.
The query planner takes LIMIT into account when generating a query plan, so you are very likely to get different plans (yielding different row orders) depending on what you use for LIMIT and OFFSET. Thus, using different LIMIT/OFFSET values to select different subsets of a query result will give inconsistent results unless you enforce a predictable result ordering with ORDER BY. This is not a bug; it is an inherent consequence of the fact that SQL does not promise to deliver the results of a query in any particular order unless ORDER BY is used to constrain the order.
It is even possible for repeated executions of the same LIMIT query to return different subsets of the rows of a table, if there is not an ORDER BY to enforce selection of a deterministic subset. Again, this is not a bug; determinism of the results is simply not guaranteed in such a case.
FOR UPDATE, FOR NO KEY UPDATE, FOR SHARE and FOR KEY SHARE are locking clauses; they affect how SELECT locks rows as they are obtained from the table.
The locking clause has the general form
where lock_strength can be one of
For more information on each row-level lock mode, refer to Section 13.3.2.
To prevent the operation from waiting for other transactions to commit, use either the NOWAIT or SKIP LOCKED option. With NOWAIT, the statement reports an error, rather than waiting, if a selected row cannot be locked immediately. With SKIP LOCKED, any selected rows that cannot be immediately locked are skipped. Skipping locked rows provides an inconsistent view of the data, so this is not suitable for general purpose work, but can be used to avoid lock contention with multiple consumers accessing a queue-like table. Note that NOWAIT and SKIP LOCKED apply only to the row-level lock(s) — the required ROW SHARE table-level lock is still taken in the ordinary way (see Chapter 13). You can use LOCK with the NOWAIT option first, if you need to acquire the table-level lock without waiting.
If specific tables are named in a locking clause, then only rows coming from those tables are locked; any other tables used in the SELECT are simply read as usual. A locking clause without a table list affects all tables used in the statement. If a locking clause is applied to a view or sub-query, it affects all tables used in the view or sub-query. However, these clauses do not apply to WITH queries referenced by the primary query. If you want row locking to occur within a WITH query, specify a locking clause within the WITH query.
Multiple locking clauses can be written if it is necessary to specify different locking behavior for different tables. If the same table is mentioned (or implicitly affected) by more than one locking clause, then it is processed as if it was only specified by the strongest one. Similarly, a table is processed as NOWAIT if that is specified in any of the clauses affecting it. Otherwise, it is processed as SKIP LOCKED if that is specified in any of the clauses affecting it.
The locking clauses cannot be used in contexts where returned rows cannot be clearly identified with individual table rows; for example they cannot be used with aggregation.
When a locking clause appears at the top level of a SELECT query, the rows that are locked are exactly those that are returned by the query; in the case of a join query, the rows locked are those that contribute to returned join rows. In addition, rows that satisfied the query conditions as of the query snapshot will be locked, although they will not be returned if they were updated after the snapshot and no longer satisfy the query conditions. If a LIMIT is used, locking stops once enough rows have been returned to satisfy the limit (but note that rows skipped over by OFFSET will get locked). Similarly, if a locking clause is used in a cursor's query, only rows actually fetched or stepped past by the cursor will be locked.
When a locking clause appears in a sub-SELECT, the rows locked are those returned to the outer query by the sub-query. This might involve fewer rows than inspection of the sub-query alone would suggest, since conditions from the outer query might be used to optimize execution of the sub-query. For example,
will lock only rows having col1 = 5, even though that condition is not textually within the sub-query.
Previous releases failed to preserve a lock which is upgraded by a later savepoint. For example, this code:
would fail to preserve the FOR UPDATE lock after the ROLLBACK TO. This has been fixed in release 9.3.
It is possible for a SELECT command running at the READ COMMITTED transaction isolation level and using ORDER BY and a locking clause to return rows out of order. This is because ORDER BY is applied first. The command sorts the result, but might then block trying to obtain a lock on one or more of the rows. Once the SELECT unblocks, some of the ordering column values might have been modified, leading to those rows appearing to be out of order (though they are in order in terms of the original column values). This can be worked around at need by placing the FOR UPDATE/SHARE clause in a sub-query, for example
Note that this will result in locking all rows of mytable, whereas FOR UPDATE at the top level would lock only the actually returned rows. This can make for a significant performance difference, particularly if the ORDER BY is combined with LIMIT or other restrictions. So this technique is recommended only if concurrent updates of the ordering columns are expected and a strictly sorted result is required.
At the REPEATABLE READ or SERIALIZABLE transaction isolation level this would cause a serialization failure (with a SQLSTATE of '40001'), so there is no possibility of receiving rows out of order under these isolation levels.
TABLE CommandThe command
is equivalent to
It can be used as a top-level command or as a space-saving syntax variant in parts of complex queries. Only the WITH, UNION, INTERSECT, EXCEPT, ORDER BY, LIMIT, OFFSET, FETCH and FOR locking clauses can be used with TABLE; the WHERE clause and any form of aggregation cannot be used.
要讓資料表 films 與資料表 distributors 進行交叉查詢的話：
要在 films 資料表中以 kind 分組，並彙總 len 欄位的話：
To sum the column len of all films, group the results by kind and show those group totals that are less than 5 hours:
The following two examples are identical ways of sorting the individual results according to the contents of the second column (name):
The next example shows how to obtain the union of the tables distributors and actors, restricting the results to those that begin with the letter W in each table. Only distinct rows are wanted, so the key word ALL is omitted.
This example shows how to use a function in the FROM clause, both with and without a column definition list:
Here is an example of a function with an ordinality column added:
This example shows how to use a simple WITH clause:
Notice that the WITH query was evaluated only once, so that we got two sets of the same three random values.
This example uses WITH RECURSIVE to find all subordinates (direct or indirect) of the employee Mary, and their level of indirectness, from a table that shows only direct subordinates:
Notice the typical form of recursive queries: an initial condition, followed by UNION, followed by the recursive part of the query. Be sure that the recursive part of the query will eventually return no tuples, or else the query will loop indefinitely. (See Section 7.8 for more examples.)
This example uses LATERAL to apply a set-returning function get_product_names() for each row of the manufacturers table:
Manufacturers not currently having any products would not appear in the result, since it is an inner join. If we wished to include the names of such manufacturers in the result, we could do:
Of course, the SELECT statement is compatible with the SQL standard. But there are some extensions and some missing features.
FROM ClausesPostgreSQL allows one to omit the FROM clause. It has a straightforward use to compute the results of simple expressions:
Some other SQL databases cannot do this except by introducing a dummy one-row table from which to do the SELECT.
Note that if a FROM clause is not specified, the query cannot reference any database tables. For example, the following query is invalid:
PostgreSQL releases prior to 8.1 would accept queries of this form, and add an implicit entry to the query's FROM clause for each table referenced by the query. This is no longer allowed.
SELECT ListsThe list of output expressions after SELECT can be empty, producing a zero-column result table. This is not valid syntax according to the SQL standard. PostgreSQL allows it to be consistent with allowing zero-column tables. However, an empty list is not allowed when DISTINCT is used.
AS Key WordIn the SQL standard, the optional key word AS can be omitted before an output column name whenever the new column name is a valid column name (that is, not the same as any reserved keyword). PostgreSQL is slightly more restrictive: AS is required if the new column name matches any keyword at all, reserved or not. Recommended practice is to use AS or double-quote output column names, to prevent any possible conflict against future keyword additions.
In FROM items, both the standard and PostgreSQL allow AS to be omitted before an alias that is an unreserved keyword. But this is impractical for output column names, because of syntactic ambiguities.
ONLY and InheritanceThe SQL standard requires parentheses around the table name when writing ONLY, for example SELECT * FROM ONLY (tab1), ONLY (tab2) WHERE .... PostgreSQL considers these parentheses to be optional.
PostgreSQL allows a trailing * to be written to explicitly specify the non-ONLY behavior of including child tables. The standard does not allow this.
(These points apply equally to all SQL commands supporting the ONLY option.)
TABLESAMPLE Clause RestrictionsThe TABLESAMPLE clause is currently accepted only on regular tables and materialized views. According to the SQL standard it should be possible to apply it to any FROM item.
FROMPostgreSQL allows a function call to be written directly as a member of the FROM list. In the SQL standard it would be necessary to wrap such a function call in a sub-SELECT; that is, the syntax FROMfunc(...) alias is approximately equivalent to FROM LATERAL (SELECT func(...)) alias. Note that LATERAL is considered to be implicit; this is because the standard requires LATERAL semantics for an UNNEST() item in FROM. PostgreSQL treats UNNEST() the same as other set-returning functions.
GROUP BY and ORDER BYIn the SQL-92 standard, an ORDER BY clause can only use output column names or numbers, while a GROUP BY clause can only use expressions based on input column names. PostgreSQL extends each of these clauses to allow the other choice as well (but it uses the standard's interpretation if there is ambiguity). PostgreSQL also allows both clauses to specify arbitrary expressions. Note that names appearing in an expression will always be taken as input-column names, not as output-column names.
SQL:1999 and later use a slightly different definition which is not entirely upward compatible with SQL-92. In most cases, however, PostgreSQL will interpret an ORDER BY or GROUP BY expression the same way SQL:1999 does.
PostgreSQL recognizes functional dependency (allowing columns to be omitted from GROUP BY) only when a table's primary key is included in the GROUP BY list. The SQL standard specifies additional conditions that should be recognized.
LIMIT and OFFSETThe clauses LIMIT and OFFSET are PostgreSQL-specific syntax, also used by MySQL. The SQL:2008 standard has introduced the clauses OFFSET ... FETCH {FIRST|NEXT} ... for the same functionality, as shown above in LIMIT Clause. This syntax is also used by IBM DB2. (Applications written for Oracle frequently use a workaround involving the automatically generated rownumcolumn, which is not available in PostgreSQL, to implement the effects of these clauses.)
FOR NO KEY UPDATE, FOR UPDATE, FOR SHARE, FOR KEY SHAREAlthough FOR UPDATE appears in the SQL standard, the standard allows it only as an option of DECLARE CURSOR. PostgreSQL allows it in any SELECT query as well as in sub-SELECTs, but this is an extension. The FOR NO KEY UPDATE, FOR SHARE and FOR KEY SHARE variants, as well as the NOWAIT and SKIP LOCKED options, do not appear in the standard.
WITHPostgreSQL allows INSERT, UPDATE, and DELETE to be used as WITH queries. This is not found in the SQL standard.
DISTINCT ON ( ... ) is an extension of the SQL standard.
ROWS FROM( ... ) is an extension of the SQL standard.