PostgreSQL 正體中文使用手冊
PostgreSQL.TW官方使用手冊小島故事加入社團
11
11
  • 簡介
  • 前言
    • 1. 什麼是PostgreSQL?
    • 2. PostgreSQL沿革
    • 3. 慣例
    • 4. 其他參考資訊
    • 5. 問題回報指南
  • I. 新手教學
    • 1. 入門指南
      • 1.1. 安裝
      • 1.2. 基礎架構
      • 1.3. 建立一個資料庫
      • 1.4. 存取一個資料庫
    • 2. SQL查詢語言
      • 2.1. 簡介
      • 2.2. 概念
      • 2.3. 創建一個新的資料表
      • 2.4. 資料列是資料表的組成單位
      • 2.5. 資料表的查詢
      • 2.6. 交叉查詢
      • 2.7. 彙總查詢
      • 2.8. 更新資料
      • 2.9. 刪除資料
    • 3. 先進功能
      • 3.1. 簡介
      • 3.2. 檢視表(View)
      • 3.3. 外部索引鍵
      • 3.4. 交易安全
      • 3.5. 窗函數
      • 3.6. 繼承
      • 3.7. 結論
  • II. SQL查詢語言
    • 4. SQL語法
      • 4.1. 語法結構
      • 4.2. 參數表示式
      • 4.3. 函數呼叫
    • 5. 定義資料結構
      • 5.1. 認識資料表
      • 5.2. 預設值
      • 5.3. 限制條件
      • 5.4. 系統欄位
      • 5.5. 表格變更
      • 5.6. 權限
      • 5.7. 資料列安全原則
      • 5.8. Schemas
      • 5.9. 繼承
      • 5.10. 分割資料表
      • 5.11. 外部資料
      • 5.12. 其他資料庫物件
      • 5.13. 相依性追蹤
    • 6. 資料處理
      • 6.1. 新增資料
      • 6.2. 更新資料
      • 6.3. 刪除資料
      • 6.4. 修改並回傳資料
    • 7. 資料查詢
      • 7.1. 概觀
      • 7.2. 資料表表示式
      • 7.3. 取得資料列表
      • 7.4. 合併查詢結果
      • 7.5. 資料排序
      • 7.6. 指定資料範圍
      • 7.7. 列舉資料
      • 7.8. 遞迴查詢(Common Table Expressions)
    • 8. 資料型別
      • 8.1. 數字型別
      • 8.2. 貨幣型別
      • 8.3. 字串型別
      • 8.4. 位元組型別(bytea)
      • 8.5. 日期時間型別
      • 8.6. 布林型別
      • 8.7. 列舉型別
      • 8.8. 地理資訊型別
      • 8.9. 網路資訊型別
      • 8.10. 位元字串型別
      • 8.11. 全文檢索型別
      • 8.12. UUID型別
      • 8.13. XML型別
      • 8.14. JSON型別
      • 8.15. 陣列
      • 8.16. 複合型別
      • 8.17. 範圍型別
      • 8.18. 指標型別
      • 8.19. pg_lsn型別
      • 8.20. 概念型別
    • 9. 函式及運算子
      • 9.1. 邏輯運算子
      • 9.2. 比較函式及運算子
      • 9.3. 數學函式及運算子
      • 9.4. 字串函式及運算子
      • 9.5. 位元字串函式及運算子
      • 9.6. 二元字串函式及運算子
      • 9.7. 特徵比對
      • 9.8. 型別轉換函式
      • 9.9 日期時間函式及運算子
      • 9.10. 列舉型別函式
      • 9.11. 地理資訊函式及運算子
      • 9.12. 網路位址函式及運算子
      • 9.13. 文字檢索函式及運算子
      • 9.14. XML函式
      • 9.15. JSON函式及運算子
      • 9.16. 序列函式
      • 9.17. 條件表示式
      • 9.18. 陣列函式及運算子
      • 9.19. 範圍函式及運算子
      • 9.20. 彙總函數
      • 9.21. Window函式
      • 9.22. 子查詢
      • 9.23. 資料列與陣列的比較運算
      • 9.24. 集合回傳函式
      • 9.25. 系統資訊函數
      • 9.26. 系統管理函式
      • 9.27. 觸發函式
      • 9.28. 事件觸發函式
    • 10. 型別轉換
      • 10.1. 概觀
      • 10.2. 運算子
      • 10.3. 函式
      • 10.4. 資料儲存轉換規則
      • 10.5. UNION、CASE 等相關結構
      • 10.6. SELECT輸出規則
    • 11. 索引(Index)
      • 11.1. 簡介
      • 11.2. 索引型別
      • 11.3. 多欄位索引
      • 11.4. 索引與ORDER BY
      • 11.5. 善用多個索引
      • 11.6. 唯一值索引
      • 11.7. 表示式索引
      • 11.8. 部份索引(partial index)
      • 11.9. 運算子物件及家族
      • 11.10. 索引與排序規則
      • 11.11. 索引限定查詢(Index-only scan)
      • 11.12. 檢查索引運用
    • 12. 全文檢索
      • 12.1. 簡介
      • 12.2. 查詢與索引
      • 12.3. 細部控制
      • 12.4. 延伸功能
      • 12.5. 斷詞
      • 12.6. 字典
      • 12.7. 組態範例
      • 12.8. 測試與除錯
      • 12.9. GIN及GiST索引型別
      • 12.10. psql支援
      • 12.11. 功能限制
    • 13. 一致性管理(MVCC)
      • 13.1. 簡介
      • 13.2. 交易隔離
      • 13.3. 鎖定模式
      • 13.4. 在應用端檢視資料一致性
      • 13.5. 特別注意
      • 13.6. 鎖定與索引
    • 14. 效能技巧
      • 14.1. 善用EXPLAIN
      • 14.2. 統計資訊
      • 14.3. 使用確切的JOIN方式
      • 14.4. 快速建立資料庫內容
      • 14.5. 彈性設定
    • 15. 平行查詢
      • 15.1. 如何運作?
      • 15.2. 啓用時機?
      • 15.3. 平行查詢計畫
      • 15.4. 平行查詢的安全性
  • III. 系統管理
    • 16. 用原始碼安裝
      • 16.1. Short Version
      • 16.2. Requirements
      • 16.3. Getting The Source
      • 16.4. 安裝流程
      • 16.5. Post-Installation Setup
      • 16.6. Supported Platforms
      • 16.7. 平台相關的注意事項
    • 17. 用原始碼在 Windows 上安裝
      • 17.1. Building with Visual C++ or the Microsoft Windows SDK
    • 18. 服務配置與維運
      • 18.1. PostgreSQL 使用者帳號
      • 18.2. Creating a Database Cluster
      • 18.3. Starting the Database Server
      • 18.4. 核心資源管理
      • 18.5. Shutting Down the Server
      • 18.6. Upgrading a PostgreSQL Cluster
      • 18.7. Preventing Server Spoofing
      • 18.8. Encryption Options
      • 18.9. Secure TCP/IP Connections with SSL
      • 18.10. Secure TCP/IP Connections with SSH Tunnels
      • 18.11. 在 Windows 註冊事件日誌
    • 19. 服務組態設定
      • 19.1. Setting Parameters
      • 19.2. File Locations
      • 19.3. 連線與認證
      • 19.4. 資源配置
      • 19.5. Write Ahead Log
      • 19.6. 複寫(Replication)
      • 19.7. 查詢規畫
      • 19.8. 錯誤回報與日誌記錄
      • 19.9. Run-time Statistics
      • 19.10. 自動資料庫清理
      • 19.11. 用戶端連線預設參數
      • 19.12. 交易鎖定管理
      • 19.13. 版本與平台的相容性
      • 19.14. Error Handling
      • 19.15. 預先配置的參數
      • 19.16. Customized Options
      • 19.17. Developer Options
      • 19.18. Short Options
    • 20. 使用者認證
      • 20.1. 設定檔:pg_hba.conf
      • 20.2. User Name Maps
      • 20.3. Authentication Methods
      • 20.4. Authentication Problems
    • 21. 資料庫角色
      • 21.1. Database Roles
      • 21.2. Role Attributes
      • 21.3. Role Membership
      • 21.4. 移除角色
      • 21.5. Default Roles
      • 21.6. Function Security
    • 22. Managing Databases
      • 22.1. Overview
      • 22.2. Creating a Database
      • 22.3. 樣版資料庫
      • 22.4. Database Configuration
      • 22.5. Destroying a Database
      • 22.6. Tablespaces
    • 23. 語系
      • 23.1. 語系支援
      • 23.2. Collation Support
      • 23.3. 字元集支援
    • 24. 例行性資料庫維護工作
      • 24.1. 例行性資料清理
      • 24.2. 定期重建索引
      • 24.3. Log File Maintenance
    • 25. 備份及還原
      • 25.1. SQL Dump
      • 25.2. File System Level Backup
      • 25.3. Continuous Archiving and Point-in-Time Recovery (PITR)
    • 26. High Availability, Load Balancing, and Replication
      • 26.1. Comparison of Different Solutions
      • 26.2. 日誌轉送備用伺服器 Log-Shipping Standby Servers
      • 26.3. Failover
      • 26.4. Alternative Method for Log Shipping
      • 26.5. Hot Standby
    • 27. Recovery Configuration
      • 27.1. Archive Recovery Settings
      • 27.2. Recovery Target Settings
      • 27.3. Standby Server Settings
    • 28. 監控資料庫活動
      • 28.1. Standard Unix Tools
      • 28.2. 統計資訊收集器
      • 28.3. Viewing Locks
      • 28.4. Progress Reporting
      • 28.5. Dynamic Tracing
    • 29. Monitoring Disk Usage
      • 29.1. Determining Disk Usage
      • 29.2. Disk Full Failure
    • 30. 高可靠度及預寫日誌
      • 30.1. Reliability
      • 30.2. Write-Ahead Logging (WAL)
      • 30.3. Asynchronous Commit
      • 30.4. WAL Configuration
      • 30.5. WAL Internals
    • 31. 邏輯複寫(Logical Replication)
      • 31.1. 發佈(Publication)
      • 31.2. 訂閱(Subscription)
      • 31.3. 衝突處理
      • 31.4. 限制
      • 31.5. 架構
      • 31.6. 監控
      • 31.7. 安全性
      • 31.8. 系統設定
      • 31.9. 快速設定
    • 32. Just-in-Time Compilation (JIT)
      • 32.1. What is JIT compilation?
      • 32.2. When to JIT?
      • 32.3. Configuration
      • 32.4. Extensibility
    • 33. 迴歸測試
      • 33.1. Running the Tests
      • 33.2. Test Evaluation
      • 33.3. Variant Comparison Files
      • 33.4. TAP Tests
      • 33.5. Test Coverage Examination
  • IV. 用戶端介面
    • 34. libpq - C Library
      • 34.1. 資料庫連線控制函數
      • 34.2. 連線狀態函數
      • 34.3. Command Execution Functions
      • 34.4. Asynchronous Command Processing
      • 34.5. Retrieving Query Results Row-By-Row
      • 34.6. Canceling Queries in Progress
      • 34.7. The Fast-Path Interface
      • 34.8. Asynchronous Notification
      • 34.9. Functions Associated with the COPY Command
      • 34.10. Control Functions
      • 34.11. Miscellaneous Functions
      • 34.12. Notice Processing
      • 34.13. Event System
      • 34.14. 環境變數
      • 34.15. 密碼檔
      • 34.16. The Connection Service File
      • 34.17. LDAP Lookup of Connection Parameters
      • 34.18. SSL Support
      • 34.19. Behavior in Threaded Programs
      • 34.20. Building libpq Programs
      • 34.21. Example Programs
    • 35. Large Objects
      • 35.1. Introduction
      • 35.2. Implementation Features
      • 35.3. Client Interfaces
      • 35.4. Server-side Functions
      • 35.5. Example Program
    • 36. ECPG - Embedded SQL in C
      • 36.1. The Concept
      • 36.2. Managing Database Connections
      • 36.3. Running SQL Commands
      • 36.4. Using Host Variables
      • 36.5. Dynamic SQL
      • 36.6. pgtypes Library
      • 36.7. Using Descriptor Areas
      • 36.8. Error Handling
      • 36.9. Preprocessor Directives
      • 36.10. Processing Embedded SQL Programs
      • 36.11. Library Functions
      • 36.12. Large Objects
      • 36.13. C++ Applications
      • 36.14. Embedded SQL Commands
      • 36.15. Informix Compatibility Mode
      • 36.16. Internals
    • 37. The Information Schema
      • 37.1. The Schema
      • 37.2. Data Types
      • 37.3. information_schema_catalog_name
      • 37.4. administrable_role_authorizations
      • 37.5. applicable_roles
      • 37.6. attributes
      • 37.7. character_sets
      • 37.8. check_constraint_routine_usage
      • 37.9. check_constraints
      • 37.10. collations
      • 37.11. collation_character_set_applicability
      • 37.12. column_domain_usage
      • 37.13. column_options
      • 37.14. column_privileges
      • 37.15. column_udt_usage
      • 37.16. columns
      • 37.17. constraint_column_usage
      • 37.18. constraint_table_usage
      • 37.19. data_type_privileges
      • 37.20. domain_constraints
      • 37.21. domain_udt_usage
      • 37.22. domains
      • 37.23. element_types
      • 37.24. enabled_roles
      • 37.25. foreign_data_wrapper_options
      • 37.26. foreign_data_wrappers
      • 37.27. foreign_server_options
      • 37.28. foreign_servers
      • 37.29. foreign_table_options
      • 37.30. foreign_tables
      • 37.31. key_column_usage
      • 37.32. parameters
      • 37.33. referential_constraints
      • 37.34. role_column_grants
      • 37.35. role_routine_grants
      • 37.36. role_table_grants
      • 37.37. role_udt_grants
      • 37.38. role_usage_grants
      • 37.39. routine_privileges
      • 37.40. routines
      • 37.41. schemata
      • 37.42. sequences
      • 37.43. sql_features
      • 37.44. sql_implementation_info
      • 37.45. sql_languages
      • 37.46. sql_packages
      • 37.47. sql_parts
      • 37.48. sql_sizing
      • 37.49. sql_sizing_profiles
      • 37.50. table_constraints
      • 37.51. table_privileges
      • 37.52. tables
      • 37.53. transforms
      • 37.54. triggered_update_columns
      • 37.55. triggers
      • 37.56. udt_privileges
      • 37.57. usage_privileges
      • 37.58. user_defined_types
      • 37.59. user_mapping_options
      • 37.60. user_mappings
      • 37.61. view_column_usage
      • 37.62. view_routine_usage
      • 37.63. view_table_usage
      • 37.64. views
  • V. 資料庫程式設計
    • 38. SQL 延伸功能
      • 38.1. How Extensibility Works
      • 38.2. The PostgreSQL Type System
      • 38.3. 使用者自訂函數
      • 38.4. User-defined Procedures
      • 38.5. Query Language (SQL) Functions
      • 38.6. Function Overloading
      • 38.7. 函數易變性類別
      • 38.8. Procedural Language Functions
      • 38.9. Internal Functions
      • 38.10. C-Language Functions
      • 38.11. User-defined Aggregates
      • 38.12. User-defined Types
      • 38.13. User-defined Operators
      • 38.14. Operator Optimization Information
      • 38.15. Interfacing Extensions To Indexes
      • 38.16. Packaging Related Objects into an Extension
      • 38.17. Extension Building Infrastructure
    • 39. Triggers
    • 40. Event Triggers
    • 41. 規則系統
      • 41.1. The Query Tree
      • 41.2. Views and the Rule System
      • 41.3. Materialized Views
      • 41.4. Rules on INSERT, UPDATE, and DELETE
      • 41.5. 規則及權限
      • 41.6. Rules and Command Status
      • 41.7. Rules Versus Triggers
    • 42. Procedural Languages(程序語言)
      • 42.1. Installing Procedural Languages
    • 43. PL/pgSQL - SQL Procedural Language
      • 43.5. 基本語法
    • 44. PL/Tcl - Tcl Procedural Language
    • 45. PL/Perl - Perl Procedural Language
    • 46. PL/Python - Python Procedural Language
    • 47. Server Programming Interface
    • 48. Background Worker Processes
    • 49. Logical Decoding
    • 50. Replication Progress Tracking
  • VI. 參考資訊
    • I. SQL 指令
      • ALTER DATABASE
      • ALTER DEFAULT PRIVILEGES
      • ALTER EXTENSION
      • ALTER FUNCTION
      • ALTER INDEX
      • ALTER LANGUAGE
      • ALTER MATERIALIZED VIEW
      • ALTER POLICY
      • ALTER PUBLICATION
      • ALTER ROLE
      • ALTER RULE
      • ALTER SCHEMA
      • ALTER SEQUENCE
      • ALTER STATISTICS
      • ALTER SUBSCRIPTION
      • ALTER TABLE
      • ALTER TABLESPACE
      • ALTER TRIGGER
      • ALTER TYPE
      • ALTER VIEW
      • ANALYZE
      • CLUSTER
      • COMMENT
      • COPY
      • CREATE CAST
      • CREATE DATABASE
      • CREATE EXTENSION
      • CREATE FOREIGN TABLE
      • CREATE FOREIGN DATA WRAPPER
      • CREATE FUNCTION
      • CREATE INDEX
      • CREATE LANGUAGE
      • CREATE MATERIALIZED VIEW
      • CREATE DOMAIN
      • CREATE POLICY
      • CREATE PROCEDURE
      • CREATE PUBLICATION
      • CREATE ROLE
      • CREATE RULE
      • CREATE SCHEMA
      • CREATE SEQUENCE
      • CREATE SERVER
      • CREATE STATISTICS
      • CREATE SUBSCRIPTION
      • CREATE TABLE
      • CREATE TABLE AS
      • CREATE TABLESPACE
      • CREATE TRANSFORM
      • CREATE TRIGGER
      • CREATE TYPE
      • CREATE USER
      • CREATE USER MAPPING
      • CREATE VIEW
      • DELETE
      • DO
      • DROP DATABASE
      • DROP EXTENSION
      • DROP FUNCTION
      • DROP INDEX
      • DROP LANGUAGE
      • DROP MATERIALIZED VIEW
      • DROP OWNED
      • DROP POLICY
      • DROP ROLE
      • DROP RULE
      • DROP SCHEMA
      • DROP SEQUENCE
      • DROP STATISTICS
      • DROP SUBSCRIPTION
      • DROP TABLE
      • DROP TABLESPACE
      • DROP TRANSFORM
      • DROP TRIGGER
      • DROP TYPE
      • DROP USER
      • DROP VIEW
      • EXECUTE
      • EXPLAIN
      • GRANT
      • IMPORT FOREIGN SCHEMA
      • INSERT
      • LISTEN
      • LOAD
      • NOTIFY
      • PREPARE TRANSACTION
      • REASSIGN OWNED
      • REFRESH MATERIALIZED VIEW
      • REINDEX
      • RESET
      • REVOKE
      • SELECT
      • SELECT INTO
      • SET
      • SET CONSTRAINTS
      • SET ROLE
      • SET SESSION AUTHORIZATION
      • SET TRANSACTION
      • SHOW
      • TRUNCATE
      • UNLISTEN
      • UPDATE
      • VACUUM
      • VALUES
    • II. PostgreSQL 用戶端工具
      • createdb
      • createuser
      • dropdb
      • dropuser
      • pgbench
      • pg_dump
      • psql
      • vacuumdb
    • III. PostgreSQL 伺服器應用程式
      • pg_test_timing
      • postgres
  • VII. 資料庫進階
    • 52. 系統目錄
      • 52.3. pg_am
      • 52.7. pg_attribute
      • 52.8. pg_authid
      • 52.9. pg_auth_members
      • 52.11 pg_class
      • 52.12. pg_collation
      • 52.13. pg_constraint
      • 52.15 pg_database
      • 52.26 pg_index
      • 52.29. pg_language
      • 52.32. pg_namespace
      • 52.33. pg_opclass
      • 52.38. pg_policy
      • 52.39. pg_proc
      • 52.44. pg_rewrite
      • 52.50. pg_statistic
      • 52.51. pg_statistic_ext
      • 52.54. pg_tablespace
      • 52.56. pg_trigger
      • 52.62. pg_type
      • 52.79. pg_replication_origin_status
      • 52.81 pg_roles
      • 52.85. pg_settings
      • 52.87. pg_stats
    • 53. Frontend/Backend Protocol
      • 53.1. Overview
      • 53.2. Message Flow
      • 53.3. SASL Authentication
      • 53.4. Streaming Replication Protocol
      • 53.5. Logical Streaming Replication Protocol
      • 53.6. Message Data Types
      • 53.7. Message Formats
      • 53.8. Error and Notice Message Fields
      • 53.9. Logical Replication Message Formats
      • 53.10. Summary of Changes since Protocol 2.0
    • 54. PostgreSQL 程式撰寫慣例
      • 54.1. Formatting
      • 54.2. Reporting Errors Within the Server
      • 54.3. Error Message Style Guide
      • 54.4. Miscellaneous Coding Conventions
    • 56. Writing A Procedural Language Handler
    • 64. GiST Indexes
      • 64.1. Introduction
      • 64.2. Built-in Operator Classes
      • 64.3. Extensibility
      • 64.4. Implementation
      • 64.5. Examples
    • 65. SP-GiST Indexes
      • 65.1. Introduction
      • 65.2. Built-in Operator Classes
      • 65.3. Extensibility
      • 65.4. Implementation
      • 65.5. Examples
    • 66. GIN 索引
      • 66.1. 簡介
      • 66.2. 內建運算子類
      • 66.3. Extensibility
      • 66.4. Implementation
      • 66.5. GIN Tips and Tricks
      • 66.6. Limitations
      • 66.7. Examples
    • 67. BRIN Indexes
      • 67.1. Introduction
      • 67.2. Built-in Operator Classes
      • 67.3. Extensibility
    • 68. 資料庫實體儲存格式
      • 68.2. TOAST
      • 68.4 可視性映射表(Visibility Map)
    • 70. How the Planner Uses Statistics
      • 70.2. Multivariate Statistics Examples
  • VIII. 附錄
    • A. PostgreSQL錯誤代碼
    • B. 日期時間格式支援
      • B.1. 日期時間解譯流程
      • B.2. 日期時間慣用字
      • B.3. 日期時間設定檔
      • B.4. 日期時間的沿革
    • C. SQL 關鍵字
    • D. SQL 相容性
    • E. 版本資訊
    • F. 延伸支援模組
      • F.4. auto_explain
      • F.11. dblink
        • dblink
      • F.33. pg_visibility
    • G. Additional Supplied Programs
      • G.1. Client Applications
        • oid2name
        • vacuumlo
      • G.2. Server Applications
        • pg_standby
    • H. 外部專案
      • H.1. 用戶端介面
      • H.2. Administration Tools
      • H.3. Procedural Languages
      • H.4. Extensions
    • I. The Source Code Repository
      • I.1. Getting The Source via Git
    • J. 文件取得
    • K. 縮寫字
  • 參考書目
Powered by GitBook
On this page
  • Note
  • 8.14.1. JSON Input and Output Syntax
  • 8.14.2. Designing JSON documents effectively
  • 8.14.3. jsonbContainment and Existence
  • Tip
  • 8.14.4. jsonbIndexing

Was this helpful?

Edit on Git
Export as PDF
  1. II. SQL查詢語言
  2. 8. 資料型別

8.14. JSON型別

Previous8.13. XML型別Next8.15. 陣列

Last updated 7 years ago

Was this helpful?

JSON data types are for storing JSON (JavaScript Object Notation) data, as specified in. Such data can also be stored astext, but the JSON data types have the advantage of enforcing that each stored value is valid according to the JSON rules. There are also assorted JSON-specific functions and operators available for data stored in these data types; see.

There are two JSON data types:jsonandjsonb. They accept_almost_identical sets of values as input. The major practical difference is one of efficiency. Thejsondata type stores an exact copy of the input text, which processing functions must reparse on each execution; whilejsonbdata is stored in a decomposed binary format that makes it slightly slower to input due to added conversion overhead, but significantly faster to process, since no reparsing is needed.jsonbalso supports indexing, which can be a significant advantage.

Because thejsontype stores an exact copy of the input text, it will preserve semantically-insignificant white space between tokens, as well as the order of keys within JSON objects. Also, if a JSON object within the value contains the same key more than once, all the key/value pairs are kept. (The processing functions consider the last value as the operative one.) By contrast,jsonbdoes not preserve white space, does not preserve the order of object keys, and does not keep duplicate object keys. If duplicate keys are specified in the input, only the last value is kept.

In general, most applications should prefer to store JSON data asjsonb, unless there are quite specialized needs, such as legacy assumptions about ordering of object keys.

PostgreSQLallows only one character set encoding per database. It is therefore not possible for the JSON types to conform rigidly to the JSON specification unless the database encoding is UTF8. Attempts to directly include characters that cannot be represented in the database encoding will fail; conversely, characters that can be represented in the database encoding but not in UTF8 will be allowed.

RFC 7159 permits JSON strings to contain Unicode escape sequences denoted by\uXXXX. In the input function for thejsontype, Unicode escapes are allowed regardless of the database encoding, and are checked only for syntactic correctness (that is, that four hex digits follow\u). However, the input function forjsonbis stricter: it disallows Unicode escapes for non-ASCII characters (those aboveU+007F) unless the database encoding is UTF8. Thejsonbtype also rejects\u0000(because that cannot be represented inPostgreSQL'stexttype), and it insists that any use of Unicode surrogate pairs to designate characters outside the Unicode Basic Multilingual Plane be correct. Valid Unicode escapes are converted to the equivalent ASCII or UTF8 character for storage; this includes folding surrogate pairs into a single character.

Note

Many of the JSON processing functions described inwill convert Unicode escapes to regular characters, and will therefore throw the same types of errors just described even if their input is of typejsonnotjsonb. The fact that thejsoninput function does not make these checks may be considered a historical artifact, although it does allow for simple storage (without processing) of JSON Unicode escapes in a non-UTF8 database encoding. In general, it is best to avoid mixing Unicode escapes in JSON with a non-UTF8 database encoding, if possible.

When converting textual JSON input intojsonb, the primitive types described byRFC7159 are effectively mapped onto nativePostgreSQLtypes, as shown in. Therefore, there are some minor additional constraints on what constitutes validjsonbdata that do not apply to thejsontype, nor to JSON in the abstract, corresponding to limits on what can be represented by the underlying data type. Notably,jsonbwill reject numbers that are outside the range of thePostgreSQLnumericdata type, whilejsonwill not. Such implementation-defined restrictions are permitted byRFC7159. However, in practice such problems are far more likely to occur in other implementations, as it is common to represent JSON'snumberprimitive type as IEEE 754 double precision floating point (whichRFC7159 explicitly anticipates and allows for). When using JSON as an interchange format with such systems, the danger of losing numeric precision compared to data originally stored byPostgreSQLshould be considered.

Conversely, as noted in the table there are some minor restrictions on the input format of JSON primitive types that do not apply to the correspondingPostgreSQLtypes.

Table 8.23. JSON primitive types and correspondingPostgreSQLtypes

JSON primitive type

PostgreSQL

type

Notes

string

text

\u0000is disallowed, as are non-ASCII Unicode escapes if database encoding is not UTF8

number

numeric

NaNandinfinityvalues are disallowed

boolean

boolean

Only lowercasetrueandfalsespellings are accepted

null

(none)

SQLNULLis a different concept

8.14.1. JSON Input and Output Syntax

The input/output syntax for the JSON data types is as specified inRFC7159.

The following are all validjson(orjsonb) expressions:

-- Simple scalar/primitive value
-- Primitive values can be numbers, quoted strings, true, false, or null
SELECT '5'::json;

-- Array of zero or more elements (elements need not be of same type)
SELECT '[1, 2, "foo", null]'::json;

-- Object containing pairs of keys and values
-- Note that object keys must always be quoted strings
SELECT '{"bar": "baz", "balance": 7.77, "active": false}'::json;

-- Arrays and objects can be nested arbitrarily
SELECT '{"foo": [true, "bar"], "tags": {"a": 1, "b": null}}'::json;

As previously stated, when a JSON value is input and then printed without any additional processing,jsonoutputs the same text that was input, whilejsonbdoes not preserve semantically-insignificant details such as whitespace. For example, note the differences here:

SELECT '{"bar": "baz", "balance": 7.77, "active":false}'::json;
                      json                       
-------------------------------------------------
 {"bar": "baz", "balance": 7.77, "active":false}
(1 row)

SELECT '{"bar": "baz", "balance": 7.77, "active":false}'::jsonb;
                      jsonb                       
--------------------------------------------------
 {"bar": "baz", "active": false, "balance": 7.77}
(1 row)

One semantically-insignificant detail worth noting is that injsonb, numbers will be printed according to the behavior of the underlyingnumerictype. In practice this means that numbers entered withEnotation will be printed without it, for example:

SELECT '{"reading": 1.230e-5}'::json, '{"reading": 1.230e-5}'::jsonb;
         json          |          jsonb          
-----------------------+-------------------------
 {"reading": 1.230e-5} | {"reading": 0.00001230}
(1 row)

However,jsonbwill preserve trailing fractional zeroes, as seen in this example, even though those are semantically insignificant for purposes such as equality checks.

8.14.2. Designing JSON documents effectively

Representing data as JSON can be considerably more flexible than the traditional relational data model, which is compelling in environments where requirements are fluid. It is quite possible for both approaches to co-exist and complement each other within the same application. However, even for applications where maximal flexibility is desired, it is still recommended that JSON documents have a somewhat fixed structure. The structure is typically unenforced (though enforcing some business rules declaratively is possible), but having a predictable structure makes it easier to write queries that usefully summarize a set of“documents”(datums) in a table.

JSON data is subject to the same concurrency-control considerations as any other data type when stored in a table. Although storing large documents is practicable, keep in mind that any update acquires a row-level lock on the whole row. Consider limiting JSON documents to a manageable size in order to decrease lock contention among updating transactions. Ideally, JSON documents should each represent an atomic datum that business rules dictate cannot reasonably be further subdivided into smaller datums that could be modified independently.

8.14.3. jsonbContainment and Existence

Testing_containment_is an important capability ofjsonb. There is no parallel set of facilities for thejsontype. Containment tests whether onejsonbdocument has contained within it another one. These examples return true except as noted:

-- Simple scalar/primitive values contain only the identical value:
SELECT '"foo"'::jsonb @
>
 '"foo"'::jsonb;

-- The array on the right side is contained within the one on the left:
SELECT '[1, 2, 3]'::jsonb @
>
 '[1, 3]'::jsonb;

-- Order of array elements is not significant, so this is also true:
SELECT '[1, 2, 3]'::jsonb @
>
 '[3, 1]'::jsonb;

-- Duplicate array elements don't matter either:
SELECT '[1, 2, 3]'::jsonb @
>
 '[1, 2, 2]'::jsonb;

-- The object with a single pair on the right side is contained
-- within the object on the left side:
SELECT '{"product": "PostgreSQL", "version": 9.4, "jsonb": true}'::jsonb @
>
 '{"version": 9.4}'::jsonb;

-- The array on the right side is 
not
 considered contained within the
-- array on the left, even though a similar array is nested within it:
SELECT '[1, 2, [1, 3]]'::jsonb @
>
 '[1, 3]'::jsonb;  -- yields false

-- But with a layer of nesting, it is contained:
SELECT '[1, 2, [1, 3]]'::jsonb @
>
 '[[1, 3]]'::jsonb;

-- Similarly, containment is not reported here:
SELECT '{"foo": {"bar": "baz"}}'::jsonb @
>
 '{"bar": "baz"}'::jsonb;  -- yields false

-- A top-level key and an empty object is contained:
SELECT '{"foo": {"bar": "baz"}}'::jsonb @
>
 '{"foo": {}}'::jsonb;

The general principle is that the contained object must match the containing object as to structure and data contents, possibly after discarding some non-matching array elements or object key/value pairs from the containing object. But remember that the order of array elements is not significant when doing a containment match, and duplicate array elements are effectively considered only once.

As a special exception to the general principle that the structures must match, an array may contain a primitive value:

-- This array contains the primitive string value:
SELECT '["foo", "bar"]'::jsonb @
>
 '"bar"'::jsonb;

-- This exception is not reciprocal -- non-containment is reported here:
SELECT '"bar"'::jsonb @
>
 '["bar"]'::jsonb;  -- yields false

jsonbalso has an_existence_operator, which is a variation on the theme of containment: it tests whether a string (given as atextvalue) appears as an object key or array element at the top level of thejsonbvalue. These examples return true except as noted:

-- String exists as array element:
SELECT '["foo", "bar", "baz"]'::jsonb ? 'bar';

-- String exists as object key:
SELECT '{"foo": "bar"}'::jsonb ? 'foo';

-- Object values are not considered:
SELECT '{"foo": "bar"}'::jsonb ? 'bar';  -- yields false

-- As with containment, existence must match at the top level:
SELECT '{"foo": {"bar": "baz"}}'::jsonb ? 'bar'; -- yields false

-- A string is considered to exist if it matches a primitive JSON string:
SELECT '"foo"'::jsonb ? 'foo';

JSON objects are better suited than arrays for testing containment or existence when there are many keys or elements involved, because unlike arrays they are internally optimized for searching, and do not need to be searched linearly.

Tip

Because JSON containment is nested, an appropriate query can skip explicit selection of sub-objects. As an example, suppose that we have adoccolumn containing objects at the top level, with most objects containingtagsfields that contain arrays of sub-objects. This query finds entries in which sub-objects containing both"term":"paris"and"term":"food"appear, while ignoring any such keys outside thetagsarray:

SELECT doc-
>
'site_name' FROM websites
  WHERE doc @
>
 '{"tags":[{"term":"paris"}, {"term":"food"}]}';

One could accomplish the same thing with, say,

SELECT doc-
>
'site_name' FROM websites
  WHERE doc-
>
'tags' @
>
 '[{"term":"paris"}, {"term":"food"}]';

but that approach is less flexible, and often less efficient as well.

On the other hand, the JSON existence operator is not nested: it will only look for the specified key or array element at top level of the JSON value.

8.14.4. jsonbIndexing

GIN indexes can be used to efficiently search for keys or key/value pairs occurring within a large number ofjsonbdocuments (datums). Two GIN“operator classes”are provided, offering different performance and flexibility trade-offs.

CREATE INDEX idxgin ON api USING GIN (jdoc);

The non-default GIN operator classjsonb_path_opssupports indexing the@>operator only. An example of creating an index with this operator class is:

CREATE INDEX idxginp ON api USING GIN (jdoc jsonb_path_ops);

Consider the example of a table that stores JSON documents retrieved from a third-party web service, with a documented schema definition. A typical document is:

{
    "guid": "9c36adc1-7fb5-4d5b-83b4-90356a46061a",
    "name": "Angela Barton",
    "is_active": true,
    "company": "Magnafone",
    "address": "178 Howard Place, Gulf, Washington, 702",
    "registered": "2009-11-07T08:53:22 +08:00",
    "latitude": 19.793713,
    "longitude": 86.513373,
    "tags": [
        "enim",
        "aliquip",
        "qui"
    ]
}

We store these documents in a table namedapi, in ajsonbcolumn namedjdoc. If a GIN index is created on this column, queries like the following can make use of the index:

-- Find documents in which the key "company" has value "Magnafone"
SELECT jdoc-
>
'guid', jdoc-
>
'name' FROM api WHERE jdoc @
>
 '{"company": "Magnafone"}';

However, the index could not be used for queries like the following, because though the operator?is indexable, it is not applied directly to the indexed columnjdoc:

-- Find documents in which the key "tags" contains key or array element "qui"
SELECT jdoc-
>
'guid', jdoc-
>
'name' FROM api WHERE jdoc -
>
 'tags' ? 'qui';

Still, with appropriate use of expression indexes, the above query can use an index. If querying for particular items within the"tags"key is common, defining an index like this may be worthwhile:

CREATE INDEX idxgintags ON api USING GIN ((jdoc -
>
 'tags'));

Another approach to querying is to exploit containment, for example:

-- Find documents in which the key "tags" contains array element "qui"
SELECT jdoc-
>
'guid', jdoc-
>
'name' FROM api WHERE jdoc @
>
 '{"tags": ["qui"]}';

A simple GIN index on thejdoccolumn can support this query. But note that such an index will store copies of every key and value in thejdoccolumn, whereas the expression index of the previous example stores only data found under thetagskey. While the simple-index approach is far more flexible (since it supports queries about any key), targeted expression indexes are likely to be smaller and faster to search than a simple index.

Although thejsonb_path_opsoperator class supports only queries with the@>operator, it has notable performance advantages over the default operator classjsonb_ops. Ajsonb_path_opsindex is usually much smaller than ajsonb_opsindex over the same data, and the specificity of searches is better, particularly when queries contain keys that appear frequently in the data. Therefore search operations typically perform better than with the default operator class.

A disadvantage of thejsonb_path_opsapproach is that it produces no index entries for JSON structures not containing any values, such as{"a": {}}. If a search for documents containing such a structure is requested, it will require a full-index scan, which is quite slow.jsonb_path_opsis therefore ill-suited for applications that often perform such searches.

jsonbalso supportsbtreeandhashindexes. These are usually useful only if it's important to check equality of complete JSON documents. Thebtreeordering forjsonbdatums is seldom of great interest, but for completeness it is:

Object
>
Array
>
Boolean
>
Number
>
String
>
Null
Object with n pairs
>
object with n - 1 pairs
Array with n elements
>
array with n - 1 elements

Objects with equal numbers of pairs are compared in the order:

key-1
, 
value-1
, 
key-2
 ...

Note that object keys are compared in their storage order; in particular, since shorter keys are stored before longer keys, this can lead to results that might be unintuitive, such as:

{ "aa": 1, "c": 1} 
>
 {"b": 1, "d": 1}

Similarly, arrays with equal numbers of elements are compared in the order:

element-1
, 
element-2
 ...

Primitive JSON values are compared using the same comparison rules as for the underlyingPostgreSQLdata type. Strings are compared using the default database collation.

The various containment and existence operators, along with all other JSON operators and functions are documented in.

The default GIN operator class forjsonbsupports queries with top-level key-exists operators?,?&and?|operators and path/value-exists operator@>. (For details of the semantics that these operators implement, see.) An example of creating an index with this operator class is:

Now, theWHEREclausejdoc -> 'tags' ? 'qui'will be recognized as an application of the indexable operator?to the indexed expressionjdoc -> 'tags'. (More information on expression indexes can be found in.)

The technical difference between ajsonb_opsand ajsonb_path_opsGIN index is that the former creates independent index items for each key and value in the data, while the latter creates index items only for each value in the data.Basically, eachjsonb_path_opsindex item is a hash of the value and the key(s) leading to it; for example to index{"foo": {"bar": "baz"}}, a single index item would be created incorporating all three offoo,bar, andbazinto the hash value. Thus a containment query looking for this structure would result in an extremely specific index search; but there is no way at all to find out whetherfooappears as a key. On the other hand, ajsonb_opsindex would create three index items representingfoo,bar, andbazseparately; then to do the containment query, it would look for rows containing all three of these items. While GIN indexes can perform such an AND search fairly efficiently, it will still be less specific and slower than the equivalentjsonb_path_opssearch, especially if there are a very large number of rows containing any single one of the three index items.

For this purpose, the term“value”includes array elements, though JSON terminology sometimes considers array elements distinct from values within objects.

RFC 7159
Section 9.15
Section 9.15
Table 8.23
Section 9.15
Table 9.44
Section 11.7
[6]
[6]